If you start writing today, there's no way to know if you can write without AI

以下正文同步自 Hacker News，版权归原站所有，已转换为易读排版。

Last updatedUpdated:

Sep 22, 2026

by Simon Späti · CreatedCreated: Feb 14, 2023 · 6 min read

recently updated

Recent changes

Sep 22today

+113 / −1 words

Sep 82 weeks ago

+17 / −75 words

Aug 214 weeks ago

+25 / −4 words

Aug 66 weeks ago

+15 / −0 words

Aug 47 weeks ago

+6 / −0 words

Jul 288 weeks ago

+275 / −4 words

Jul 202 months ago

+79 / −9 words

Jul 63 months ago

+11 / −16 words

Jul 33 months ago

published · 808 words

To me, AI writing always results in this:

They always look nice at first sight, but over time, they look all the same: complex, unnatural, and busy. Same as DALL-E images.

And if it’s read by a human, it should also be written by a human. Nothing worse than having to read through a stack of elaborated text that has been generated on a small prompt. Naval elaborated it best at the The Differences between Writing and Coding

Based on the The Differences between Writing and Coding that Naval Ravikant shared, writing is consumed by human beings, and they discuss, that Id rather Read the Prompt, why would I need to read your fleshed-out article by AI, and not the lean prompt with all the insights? That’s what Naval asked Garry Tan, and they didn’t have an answer.

It’s like the below meme, AI making you Exhausted both on the creation time, as it never ends, people have more work than ever, but also on the reading side, as you need to read everyone’s bloated AI-written stuff, rather than just the prompt.

AI turns bullet points into a nice text - oh look, AI puts this blob of text into bullet points - Meme

Great example: Generating an email that we sent do an actual human being | Source:

AI Written, AI Read cartoon - Marketoonist | Tom Fishburne

Same as we do in programming: sharing AGENTS.md or Agentic Skills so others can use that insight too, rather than sharing 10 different solutions. Obviously, as explained in the difference between writing in programming, it’s not the same as a computer consumes programming, and if you solve a problem, why not generate the app, the solution, and share that? We can’t do that in writing.

And as I argue in Manual Writing and Will AI replace Humans, the second point has character, a soul and human behind, no AI model will ever have.

I was wondering if AI should suggest to me writings - a question asked by Euwyn Goh . It might for brainstorming. I don’t want AI to write my sentences, but it could help me brainstorm.

Usually, the way I work is: first, I do brainstorming, maybe some research on what happened in history. In that phase, AI might help. But also, most often when I ask what I should add to my articles, AI says to add “real-world examples”. So, most of the time it’s not that creative. And the worst part, after using AI, I usually haven’t done my work, and I’m more exhausted than when I just write it 🤐.

What I used it for just recently, though, was to go through my notes, list MY notes, and add them to the chapter of my book (all in markdown, which’s why it works well). What’s nice is that you provide a way to train my own data for that AI using a local model. At least that’s what I’m trying a little at

obsidian-note-taking-assistant with local first Second Brain RAG for any Obsidian Vault (works with any Markdown). Works with DuckDB. Also includes a web-app, see the blog article at

Building an Obsidian RAG with DuckDB. Or more examples at Second Brain Assistant with Obsidian (NoteGPT).

I’m all in for Writing Manually and not replacing my thinking with AI, especially if a human is consuming it.

If Consumed by a Human, Should Be Written by Human

See also Use Cases of AI Writing (ChatGPT, Lex, etc.) and Creative Prompt Engineering.

Hannes Mühleisen

said that he has the benefit of having coded or created DuckDB before the AI hype, so people trust the product, but it’s hard if you start today, it’s really hard to see if a product is good or bad- they all look amazing.

It’s the same for writing. If you can show you have written before using AI, people can trust you more easily than when you start today. If you haven’t, there’s no way for readers to know if you can write without AI, whereas if you have written long enough, people know.

AI Content Is Everywhere on Social Media, Especially LinkedIn | Pangram Labs - obviously dedecting AI content is also not reliable, again, AI is not deterministic, it might even say once it’s AI written and once not if you asked it twice, but here are some reports to ponder from that article:

Reddit replies are rarely AI written - though I know that is also depenend on the subreddit for sure:

Source

From the article:

“Collectively, since the Chrome Extension’s launch on April 24th 2026, users who opted into sharing their data for research helped us create a dataset of 1,002,627 posts across several of the largest social media platforms on the internet: LinkedIn, Medium, Substack, X/Twitter, and Reddit.

Each post in our dataset is counted only once, and we only scan items that are longer than 50 words. Every post was analyzed with Pangram 3.3, our latest AI detection model, which achieves a 0.01% false positive rate. This dataset allows us a direct window into what AI-generated content people are seeing on their feeds at this point in time.”

Origin: AOMW Course- The Art of Modern Writing (Foster.co),

AI Writing with Dan Shipper - YouTube

References: ChatGPT, Creative Prompt Engineering , My Services and Target Audience (SSP Data),Brainstorming Ideas for Earning Money - Book, SSP Data

正文由 FLUX 从来源站点 RSS 同步，内容未经改写；遇到排版缺失或需要图片、视频时请以原文为准。